[ixpmanager] Member configuration for virtualized infrastructure

Mauricio Oviedo mauricio at socium.cr
Wed Aug 24 10:24:36 IST 2022


Hi Marco, thanks for the fast response. What did you use for physical port to define them as members (probono, or any other) in IXP Manager if they share the same port? We want to use the Route Server client option for them.

Best,
Mauricio

From: ixpmanager <ixpmanager-bounces at inex.ie> on behalf of Marco d'Itri via ixpmanager <ixpmanager at inex.ie>
Date: Wednesday, 24 August 2022 at 12:15
To: INEX IXP Manager Users Mailing List <ixpmanager at inex.ie>
Cc: Marco d'Itri <md at Linux.IT>
Subject: Re: [ixpmanager] Member configuration for virtualized infrastructure
On Aug 24, Mauricio Oviedo via ixpmanager <ixpmanager at inex.ie> wrote:

> I would like to know what ideas you have for adding probono members, which are services running in virtual machines and sharing a physical port.
>
> These could be value-added services like AS112, RIPE Anchors, etc.
>
> Have you had this situation?
Yes, one of our route servers, the quaratine route server, the ARP
sponge and the AS112 server[1] share the same physical host as
systemd-nspawn containers, using a bridge interface in the host.
The same setup would work as well for VMs, if you want more isolation of
systems managed by third parties.

[1] https://github.com/rfc1036/minap/tree/master/ansible/as112

--
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.inex.ie/pipermail/ixpmanager/attachments/20220824/e99ddc9e/attachment.htm>


More information about the ixpmanager mailing list